Necessary access may be considered if a plot lacks the connection to a public road required for proper use. This is not simply a right to choose the shortest or most convenient route. Necessity and the burdened neighbour’s interests matter.
Practical example
Existing access is difficult but usable. Wanting a shorter route through the neighbour’s courtyard does not itself prove necessity.
What to do
Prepare an access plan and alternatives. Agree the route, width, type of use and compensation. The law excludes the duty to tolerate access where the owner arbitrarily removed an existing connection.
Source and consultation
Civil Code of Georgia, Articles 180, 247–248: https://matsne.gov.ge/ka/document/view/31702 — checked on 28.10.2026.
YURFIRMA can assess the documents and prepare terms. The solution depends on the facts, agreement and evidence. Contact us.
This is general information and does not replace a legal assessment of your specific case. The current law and the relevant facts are checked again when you seek advice.